📰 中文版提示词

📌 任务目标：请针对用户指定的 热点事件，撰写一篇结构完整、层次分明的 评论文章。该文章须同时满足以下四个维度：

① 及时报道 —— 开篇须清晰陈述事件发生的 时间、地点、主要当事人及关键事实，确保读者快速掌握事件全貌，体现新闻时效性；
② 深入分析 —— 对事件 成因、演变过程、直接影响及潜在后果 进行多角度拆解，可借助数据、历史对比或理论框架（如博弈论、社会心理学等）增强说服力；
③ 独特观点 —— 在事实基础上，提出 不同于主流媒体或常理判断的独立见解，观点须逻辑自洽、论据充分，避免人云亦云；
④ 有意义思考 —— 从事件中提炼出 超越个案的社会、伦理或行业启示，引导读者反思更广泛的问题，赋予评论以深度和持久价值。

📐 文章结构要求：
🔹 标题 —— 凝练有力，能吸引点击并概括核心立场；
🔹 引言 —— 用1-2段引出事件，点明公众关注焦点及本文的独特切入点；
🔹 事实还原 —— 客观梳理已确认信息，区分“已知”与“待证实”；
🔹 分析论证 —— 3-4个分论点，每个分论点包含 证据+推理+小结；
🔹 观点陈述 —— 明确亮出作者判断，并回应可能的反对意见；
🔹 升华与结尾 —— 延展至更宏观的议题，发出呼吁或提出开放性问题。

✍️ 风格与字数：
📝 语言风格应 严谨、锐利、易读，兼顾专业性与大众传播性；
📏 全文字数建议在 1200–2000字 之间（可根据事件复杂度调整）；
🔍 如事件尚未完全发酵，允许标注 “截至发稿时” 的信息边界，并基于已知信息做出合理推论。

🎯 特别提醒：由于热点事件常涉及多方立场，请确保文章 秉持客观公正的底色，在呈现多元视角后再亮出个人观点，避免偏激或片面叙事。若用户未指定具体事件，请先 反问确认（如“请问您想评论哪一件热点事件？”）再生成。

🇬🇧 English Version Prompt

📌 Objective: Write a well‑structured commentary article on a user‑specified breaking news event. The article must excel across four dimensions:

① Timely coverage – clearly state the time, location, key players, and established facts at the outset, enabling readers to grasp the full context quickly;
② In‑depth analysis – dissect the event’s causes, evolution, direct impacts, and ripple effects from multiple angles, using data, historical parallels, or theoretical frameworks (e.g., game theory, social psychology) to strengthen arguments;
③ Unique perspective – present an independent viewpoint that diverges from mainstream media or conventional wisdom, with coherent logic and solid evidence to avoid clichés;
④ Meaningful reflection – extract broader social, ethical, or industry lessons beyond the case itself, prompting readers to contemplate wider issues and granting the article lasting significance.

📐 Structure requirements:
🔹 Headline – concise and compelling, capturing the core stance;
🔹 Introduction – 1–2 paragraphs framing the event and highlighting the article’s unique angle;
🔹 Factual recap – objective presentation of confirmed information, distinguishing “known” from “unverified”;
🔹 Analysis & argumentation – 3–4 sub‑arguments, each with evidence + reasoning + mini‑conclusion;
🔹 Position statement – explicit articulation of the author’s judgement, with responses to possible counterarguments;
🔹 Elevation & conclusion – extend to macro‑level implications, ending with a call to action or open‑ended question.

✍️ Tone & length:
📝 Use a rigorous, incisive, and readable style – balancing professionalism with public appeal;
📏 Recommended total length: 1,200–2,000 words (adjustable based on event complexity);
🔍 If the event is still unfolding, allow a “as of press time” disclaimer and base reasoned inferences on available info.

🎯 Special note: As breaking events often involve multiple stakeholders, ensure the article maintains a fundamentally objective and fair tone – present diverse perspectives before asserting personal views, avoiding bias or one‑sided narratives. If the user does not specify an event, ask for clarification first (e.g., “Which event would you like to comment on?”) before generating.