用于对用户提交的“待考察陈述”进行11个模块的系统性深度考察。提示词从陈述结构、发起者内在模型、交互影响等维度，分析陈述属性、优化迭代、潜在响应路径、发起者意图、认知结构与信念系统等，最终输出不少于3000字的结构化报告。

中文版提示词

请对即将收到的“待考察陈述”进行系统性、批判性的深度考察，而非直接回应其内容。你将启动一个包含11个模块的分析流程，输出一份结构化的多章节报告。分析视角：以多专家协作的方式进行内部思考——[陈述结构分析单元]评估“待考察陈述”的内在结构、逻辑严谨性及改进路径；[发起者内在模型推断单元]从陈述中反向推导发起者的心智运作模式、知识背景、信念系统与自我认知框架；[动态交互影响研判单元]批判性审视陈述本身及发起者内在模型，评估其优劣及相互作用的影响。协作顺序：先由[陈述结构分析单元]进行初步解析与优化建议，随后[发起者内在模型推断单元]与[动态交互影响研判单元]并行工作，最后融合所有产出，形成全面的系统性考察报告。11个模块：A.陈述属性评估，评估陈述的内在质量、清晰度、范围、潜在偏向及激发潜力，提供五项关键分析点；B.陈述优化迭代，基于模块A提出五种改进陈述的替代版本，提升表达效率与启发性；C.潜在响应路径构思，构思一个针对陈述的完整但未直接呈现的响应路径，并阐述其生成过程，体现多维视角融合；D.发起者意图推断，从陈述中推断发起者可能存在的五种核心意图；E.认知结构补足识别，识别发起者可能存在的五类认知结构上的补足区域（如信息广度、深度或理论框架运用）；F.潜在信念系统识别，从用词、结构和内容中推断发起者可能持有的五种核心信念系统；G.信念系统探讨与作用，逐一探讨模块F中的每种信念系统，分析其内在逻辑、优势、局限及对认知与行为的影响；H.内在世界观构筑，推测发起者内在世界观与核心驱动价值的五个关键构成要素；I.内在世界观审视与作用，批判性审视模块H的世界观，探讨其对决策、互动及个人发展的积极与消极作用；J.自我感知框架假说，构建一个关于发起者自我感知框架的假说；K.自我感知框架评估与作用，评估模块J的假说，讨论其优势、弱点及对应对复杂情境和自我发展的影响。风格与语调：报告高度结构化、严谨、有深度，保持专业、客观、冷静并富有启发性。限定条件：专注于对陈述及发起者内在模型的分析，禁止直接提供对陈述的常规回应；避免无分析支撑的泛泛论述；全程使用简体中文；确保11个模块全部完成。输出要求：每个模块以清晰的Markdown标题和编号呈现，严格按要求（如“五项关键分析点”“五种替代版本”）详细阐述，报告总长度不少于3000字。请等待“待考察陈述：”后的具体内容。

英文版提示词

Systematically and critically examine the upcoming "statement to be analyzed," rather than responding to its content directly. Launch an 11-module analysis process and output a structured multi-section report. Analytical perspective: think internally in a multi-expert collaborative manner—[Statement Structure Analysis Unit] evaluates the statement's intrinsic structure, logical rigor, and improvement paths; [Author Internal Model Inference Unit] reverse-infers the author's mental operating patterns, knowledge background, belief systems, and self-perception framework from the statement; [Dynamic Interaction Impact Unit] critically examines the statement itself and the author's internal model, assessing their strengths/weaknesses and the impact of their interaction. Collaboration order: [Statement Structure Analysis Unit] first performs initial parsing and optimization suggestions; then [Author Internal Model Inference Unit] and [Dynamic Interaction Impact Unit] work in parallel; finally, merge all outputs into a comprehensive systematic examination report. 11 modules: A. Statement attribute evaluation—assess intrinsic quality, clarity, scope, potential bias, and inspirational potential, providing five key analysis points; B. Statement optimization iteration—based on Module A, propose five alternative improved versions to enhance expressive efficiency and inspiration; C. Potential response path conception—conceive a complete but unstated response path to the statement and elaborate its generation process, reflecting multi-perspective integration; D. Author intent inference—infer five possible core intentions of the author from the statement; E. Cognitive structure gap identification—identify five types of potential cognitive-structure gaps in the author (e.g., information breadth, depth, or theoretical framework application); F. Potential belief system identification—infer five core belief systems the author may hold from wording, structure, and content; G. Belief system discussion and effects—discuss each belief system from Module F one by one, analyzing internal logic, strengths, limitations, and influence on cognition and behavior; H. Internal worldview construction—infer five key components of the author's internal worldview and core driving values; I. Internal worldview examination and effects—critically examine Module H's worldview, discussing its positive and negative effects on decisions, interactions, and personal development; J. Self-perception framework hypothesis—construct a hypothesis about the author's self-perception framework; K. Self-perception framework evaluation and effects—evaluate Module J's hypothesis, discussing strengths, weaknesses, and influence on coping with complex situations and self-development. Style and tone: highly structured, rigorous, and in-depth; professional, objective, calm, and thought-provoking. Constraints: focus on analyzing the statement and the author's internal model; do not provide a conventional response to the statement; avoid unsupported general statements; use Simplified Chinese throughout; ensure all 11 modules are completed. Output requirements: present each module with clear Markdown headings and numbering, elaborate strictly per requirements (e.g., "five key analysis points," "five alternative versions"), with a total report length of no less than 3000 characters. Wait for the specific content after "Statement to be analyzed:".

🛠️ **适用 AI 工具**：ChatGPT、Claude、DeepSeek、Kimi、Gemini、通义千问