本提示词让你扮演某领域研究者，按20项框架解析论文，涵盖文献信息、研究问题、假设、设计、方法、结果、结论、贡献、图表明细、个人评价与疑问启发等。适用于学术文献精读与综述梳理场景。

中文版提示词

作为一名 XX 领域的研究者，我希望您能协助我高效阅读和总结学术文献。请针对我提供的论文，严格按照以下框架进行梳理与解析：
1. 文献信息：作者、发表年份、论文标题、期刊/会议名称、卷号、期号、起止页码、DOI 号。
2. 核心问题：清晰阐述本研究旨在解决的核心科学问题或技术瓶颈。
3. 研究假设：明确列出作者提出的核心研究假设或理论构想。
4. 研究设计：概述整体研究思路（如理论推导、仿真模拟、实验验证、案例研究等）。
5. 数据/样本来源：说明数据获取方式、样本规模、选择标准与特征。
6. 方法与技术：详述所使用的关键技术、算法、模型、实验平台、试剂材料或软件工具。
7. 分析流程：分步说明实验步骤、仿真流程或理论推导的关键环节。
8. 数据分析：说明所采用的统计方法、有效性验证手段或性能评价指标。
9. 核心发现：提炼研究中最重要、最创新的科学发现或观测现象。
10. 实验结果：总结关键定量结果（如性能指标、统计显著性）和定性结论。
11. 辅助结果：简述其他支持性的次要结果。
12. 最终结论：归纳作者基于证据得出的最终结论。
13. 贡献评价：评价本研究在理论创新、技术突破、方法改进或应用拓展方面对 XX 领域的具体贡献。
14. 关联分析：分析该工作与我的研究主题或综述方向的核心关联。
15. 综述亮点：指出其值得在我的综述中重点讨论的亮点（如开创性、争议性、局限性、未来启示）。
16. 图表明细：列出文中所有 Figure 和 Table 的编号、标题及其所展示的核心内容概述，方便快速定位和引用关键证据。
17. 个人评价：您对该研究的方法严谨性、逻辑完备性和结论可靠性的个人评价。
18. 疑问：阅读中产生的疑问或认为其存在的不足之处。
19. 启发：该研究为您带来的新思路、新想法或未来可探索的方向。
20. 参考文献：列出文中引用的 1-2 篇最具代表性的参考文献（格式：作者，年份，标题，期刊，卷期，页码）。

论文内容：[论文全文/摘要]

英文版提示词

As a researcher in the field of XX, I would like you to help me efficiently read and summarize academic literature. For the paper I provide, analyze it strictly according to the following framework:
1. Bibliographic information: authors, publication year, paper title, journal/conference name, volume, issue, page range, DOI.
2. Core problem: clearly state the core scientific problem or technical bottleneck this study aims to solve.
3. Research hypothesis: list the authors' core research hypotheses or theoretical constructs.
4. Research design: outline the overall research approach (e.g., theoretical derivation, simulation, experimental validation, case study).
5. Data/sample sources: explain how data was obtained, sample size, selection criteria, and characteristics.
6. Methods and techniques: detail the key techniques, algorithms, models, experimental platforms, reagents, or software tools used.
7. Analysis process: describe the key steps of experiments, simulations, or theoretical derivation.
8. Data analysis: state the statistical methods, validation approaches, or performance metrics used.
9. Core findings: extract the most important and innovative scientific findings or observations.
10. Experimental results: summarize key quantitative results (e.g., performance metrics, statistical significance) and qualitative conclusions.
11. Supporting results: briefly describe other supporting secondary results.
12. Final conclusions: summarize the authors' evidence-based conclusions.
13. Contribution assessment: evaluate the study's specific contribution to the XX field in theory, technical breakthrough, method improvement, or application expansion.
14. Relevance analysis: analyze the core relevance of this work to my research topic or review direction.
15. Review highlights: point out the highlights worth discussing in my review (e.g., originality, controversy, limitations, future implications).
16. Figure/table details: list the numbers, titles, and core content summaries of all figures and tables to quickly locate and cite key evidence.
17. Personal evaluation: your personal assessment of the study's methodological rigor, logical completeness, and reliability of conclusions.
18. Questions: any questions raised during reading or perceived shortcomings.
19. Inspiration: new ideas, thoughts, or future directions this study brings.
20. References: list 1-2 of the most representative cited references (format: author, year, title, journal, volume/issue, pages).

Paper content: [full paper/abstract]