基于历年法考真题，分析考点考查频率，预测高频考点并重新命制单选、多选、不定项选择题，每道题附答案解析、考点、考查方向、预测指数、考查概率与预测依据，适用于法考备考资料生成。

中文版提示词

## 任务
- 文档是历年考查真题，请根据真题考点考查频率，预测可能再次命题的考点，并据此重新命制预测题。
- 分析试题考查频率，找出高频考点，围绕高频考点命制单项选择题、多项选择题和不定项选择题。
- 试题设计：参考来源文档试题的字数，按考点设计案情。
- 考点：以关键词标出，围绕附件文档的高频考点。
- 答案解析：结论先行，对每个选项逐一分析，理由充分，不体现具体条文。
- 预测依据：说明预测原因与依据，明确考点走势预测。
- 考查概率：以百分比说明原因与理由。
- 预测指数：说明考点考查趋势与走向。
- 考查方向：对考点尝试换个角度命题。
- 案情设计：试题案情及选项与来源文档样式、情景不同。

## 命题要求
- 综合性强，考查知识点交叉融合；难度普遍较高，区分度显著。
- 注重核心原理与概念辨析；关注特定考点和常见误区。
- 强调民法典及司法解释的最新规定；案例分析为主，贴近生活实际。
- 注重法律概念的精确理解与应用。

## 基础要求
- 试题符合文档样式，包含单选、多选、不定项选择题；案情与文档不同。
- 符合文档高频考点；详细说明预测理由。
- 简单考点命制为单选题，每题1分；复杂考点命制为多选题或不定项选择题，每题2分。
- 题干与选项设计符合法考标准，参考文档样式；每道题附分数与星标，显示预测指数。
- 选项只能有A、B、C、D四个；每个选项涉及1-5个考点。
- 2018年以后的考点特别关注，2018年之前仅作参考。
- 预测题数量为文档试题的5%-10%，只选可考性最高的考点。
- 预测题不要显示年份数据；严格符合法考考查范围与真题风格。
- 答案解析对每个选项清晰明了、有逻辑层次。

## 输出格式
- 顺序：试题（含题型与分数）→ 答案解析 → 考点 → 考查方向 → 预测指数 → 考查概率 → 预测依据。
- 使用Markdown格式回答。

## 语气风格
- 命制预测题符合附件真题风格与中国法考命题风格；案情设计符合生活逻辑，体现当下时事与社会热点。

英文版提示词

## Task
- The documents are past real exam questions. Based on the frequency of tested points, predict the points likely to be tested again and create new prediction questions accordingly.
- Analyze the frequency of tested points, identify high-frequency points, and create single-choice, multiple-choice, and indeterminate-choice questions around them.
- Question design: follow the length of the source questions and design scenarios by tested point.
- Tested point: mark it with keywords, centered on the high-frequency points in the attached documents.
- Answer analysis: lead with the conclusion, analyze each option one by one with sufficient reasoning, and do not cite specific provisions.
- Prediction basis: explain the reason and basis, and clarify the trend forecast for the point.
- Probability: state it as a percentage with reasons.
- Prediction index: describe the trend of the tested point.
- Testing direction: try to test the point from a different angle.
- Scenario design: the scenario and options must differ from the source documents.

## Question-setting requirements
- Strongly integrative, with cross-cutting knowledge points; generally difficult with clear discrimination.
- Focus on core principles and conceptual distinctions; target specific points and common misconceptions.
- Emphasize the latest provisions of the Civil Code and judicial interpretations; case-analysis-oriented and close to real life.
- Emphasize precise understanding and application of legal concepts.

## Basic requirements
- Questions conform to the document style, including single-choice, multiple-choice, and indeterminate-choice; scenarios differ from the documents.
- Match high-frequency tested points; explain prediction reasons in detail.
- Simple points become single-choice questions (1 point each); complex points become multiple-choice or indeterminate-choice questions (2 points each).
- Stems and options meet bar-exam standards; each question includes a score and a star rating showing the prediction index.
- Only four options A, B, C, D; each option involves 1-5 tested points.
- Pay special attention to points after 2018; points before 2018 are for reference only.
- The number of prediction questions is 5%-10% of the document questions, selecting only the most testable points.
- Do not show year data; strictly conform to the bar-exam scope and style.
- Answer analysis is clear and logically structured for every option.

## Output format
- Order: question (with type and score) → answer analysis → tested point → testing direction → prediction index → probability → prediction basis.
- Answer in Markdown.

## Tone and style
- Conform to the attached real-question style and Chinese bar-exam style; scenarios follow real-life logic and reflect current affairs and social hot topics.

🛠️ **适用 AI 工具**：ChatGPT、Claude、Kimi、通义千问、DeepSeek、文心一言