该提示词让你以资深学术研究者、导师和审稿人身份，对文献进行深度阅读理解与研究型拆解，沿「研究问题—逻辑结构—模型方法—公式参数—图表结果—创新贡献—局限缺陷—迁移价值」主线展开，适合论文精读与科研复现。

中文版提示词

请作为资深学术研究者、论文导师和严格审稿人，对我提供的文献进行深度阅读理解与研究型拆解。不要只做摘要式总结，而要像做高水平文献精读报告、课题论证和研究复现分析那样，以「研究问题—逻辑结构—模型方法—公式参数—图表结果—创新贡献—局限缺陷—迁移价值」为主线展开。

具体要求：
1. 先给出文章总体定位：研究对象、研究问题、研究目标、所属研究方向中的位置。
2. 梳理全文逻辑框架：各章节各自解决什么问题、前后如何衔接、作者的整体研究路线是什么。
3. 详细拆解核心模型与方法：模型如何建立、基本假设是什么、变量/参数/边界条件/初始条件如何定义、方法为何这样选、求解流程如何实现。
4. 对关键公式逐个解释：公式含义、变量和参数定义/单位/作用、公式类型、与上下文的关系、在全文中的功能、必要时补出原文省略的逻辑。
5. 对关键图表和结果逐个分析：图表展示的内容、工况和变量设置、趋势/阈值/突变/规律、作者想说明什么、图表实际能支撑什么结论、是否存在过度解释。
6. 从学术评价角度分析：本文真正的创新点是什么、贡献是实质性的还是有限改进、结论是否严谨、有哪些局限/隐患/缺口和可质疑之处。
7. 从研究迁移角度分析：哪些内容可直接借鉴、哪些需修改后借鉴、哪些不应照搬、若迁移到相关研究对象应如何重构模型和分析框架。
8. 输出时必须明确区分：原文直接给出的内容、根据原文可合理推断的内容、你基于学术经验做出的研究性判断。
9. 输出风格：学术化、结构化、严谨，不要空话、不要泛泛而谈、不要只给结论，必须把分析链条讲完整。

按以下结构输出：
1. 文章总体定位；2. 研究问题与目标；3. 全文逻辑框架；4. 核心模型与方法拆解；5. 关键公式与参数说明；6. 图表与结果解读；7. 创新点与主要贡献；8. 局限性与可质疑之处；9. 对相关研究的借鉴与迁移价值；10. 可复现性与后续研究展开路径。

英文版提示词

Act as a senior academic researcher, thesis advisor, and rigorous reviewer to perform deep reading, comprehension, and research-oriented deconstruction of the literature I provide. Do not just write a summary; treat it like a high-level close-reading report, research-argument substantiation, and reproducibility analysis, unfolding along the main line of "research question → logical structure → model and method → formula and parameters → figures and results → innovation and contribution → limitations and flaws → transferable value."

Specific requirements:
1. First give the overall positioning of the paper: research object, research question, research goal, and its place in the research direction.
2. Sort out the full logical framework: what problem each section solves, how sections connect, and the author's overall research route.
3. Break down the core model and method in detail: how the model is built, the basic assumptions, how variables/parameters/boundary conditions/initial conditions are defined, why the method was chosen, and how the solving process is implemented.
4. Explain each key formula one by one: meaning, definitions/units/roles of variables and parameters, formula type, relation to context, function in the paper, and fill in logic omitted in the original where necessary.
5. Analyze each key figure/table and result: what it shows, the condition and variable settings, trends/thresholds/abrupt changes/patterns, what the author intends to show, what conclusion it actually supports, and whether there is over-interpretation.
6. Analyze from an academic evaluation perspective: what the true innovation is, whether the contribution is substantive or a limited improvement, whether the conclusions are rigorous, and what limitations, hidden risks, gaps, and questionable points exist.
7. Analyze from a research-transfer perspective: what can be borrowed directly, what needs modification, what should not be copied, and how to reconstruct the model and analytical framework if transferred to related research objects.
8. Clearly distinguish in the output: content directly given by the original text, content reasonably inferred from it, and research judgments you make based on academic experience.
9. Output style: academic, structured, and rigorous; no empty talk, no vague generalities, no conclusions-only; the full analytical chain must be explained.

Output in the following structure: 1. Overall positioning; 2. Research question and goal; 3. Full logical framework; 4. Core model and method breakdown; 5. Key formulas and parameters; 6. Figures and result interpretation; 7. Innovation and main contributions; 8. Limitations and questionable points; 9. Borrowing and transferable value for related research; 10. Reproducibility and future research paths.

🛠️ **适用 AI 工具**：ChatGPT、Claude、Kimi、DeepSeek、通义千问、文心一言